European Medicines Agency Greenlights Review Of Blenrep Combinations For Myeloma
EMA accepts GSK's MAA for Blenrep combos to treat relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Breaking News
Jul 20, 2024
Mrudula Kulkarni
![European Medicines Agency Greenlights Review Of Blenrep Combinations For Myeloma](https://pharma-now.s3.amazonaws.com/p/uploads/PressCMS/press-detail-image/european-medicines-agency-greenlights-review-of-blenrep-combinations-for-myeloma.png)
GSK plc announced today that the European Medicines Agency
(EMA) has accepted the marketing authorisation application (MAA) for Blenrep
(belantamab mafodotin) combined with either bortezomib and dexamethasone
(BorDex) or pomalidomide and dexamethasone (PomDex) for the treatment of
relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. The EMA’s Committee for Medicinal
Products for Human Use (CHMP) will now commence the formal review process to
provide a recommendation to the European Commission for potential approval.
Hesham Abdullah, Senior Vice President, Global Head
Oncology, R&D, GSK, said in a statement, “Today’s milestone reinforces the
potential for Blenrep to redefine outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma
at or after first relapse. We are working to bring Blenrep to patients as
quickly as possible given the high unmet need and the clinically robust effects
of the Blenrep combinations in the DREAMM-7 and DREAMM-8 phase III head-to-head
trials.”
The interim findings from the DREAMM-7 and DREAMM-8 phase
III trials form the basis of this application. Both trials achieved their
primary goals, demonstrating statistically significant and clinically
meaningful enhancements in progression-free survival (PFS) when using
belantamab mafodotin combinations, compared to standard care regimens in
patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Specifically, DREAMM-7
is comparing belantamab mafodotin plus BorDex against daratumumab plus BorDex,
while DREAMM-8 is assessing belantamab mafodotin with PomDex versus bortezomib
plus PomDex.
Although a positive trend in overall survival (OS) was noted
in both trials, it did not reach statistical significance at the interim
analysis stage. OS follow-up is ongoing. Furthermore, the results indicated
clinically meaningful improvements across all secondary efficacy measures,
including deeper and more sustained responses relative to the standard care
combinations. The safety and tolerability profiles of the belantamab mafodotin
combinations in these trials were generally consistent with the established
profiles of the individual agents.